Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Deja Vu At Ligambi Retrial?

Uncle Joe
By George Anastasia
For Bigtrial.net

Federal prosecutors want to retry mob boss Joseph "Uncle Joe" Ligambi and his nephew George Borgesi on racketeering conspiracy charges built around the same evidence that a jury largely rejected in the mobsters' first trial.

In a motions filed late yesterday, prosecutors argued that the issues of collateral estoppel and double-jeopardy do not apply to the conspiracy charge that is at the heart of the case. A jury in February could not decide on that charge against Ligambi and Borgesi.

Four other defendants were found guilty and one was acquitted.

U.S. District Judge Eduardo Robreno is expected to hold a hearing on motions filed by lawyers for both defendants seeking to limit or eliminate charges that can be used in a retrial set for Oct. 15. In fact, Borgesi's lawyer, Christopher Warren, has argued that the conspiracy charge against his client -- the one remaining count for which he is to be retried -- should be dismissed.

Borgesi, 50, was found not guilty of 13 counts related to gambling and loansharking. Warren argued that the jury verdict on those counts undermined the remaining conspiracy charge.

But Assistant U.S. Attorney Frank Labor, in briefs filed literally at the 11th hour -- yesterday was the deadline for the government to respond and the motions were filed close to midnight -- argued that both Warren and Ligambi's lawyer, Edwin Jocobs Jr., had misconstrued the legal issues in the case.

The doctrine of collateral estoppel "does not bar the admission of evidence of other offenses, including acquitted conduct, to prove the manner and means of a RICO conspiracy," Labor wrote.

The prosecution contends that it can use the same evidence that was presented in the first trial, including evidence tied to counts that resulted in not guilty verdicts. While layered in legal citations and Appellate Court decisions, the prosecution is arguing in essence that conspirators don't have to commit the crimes in order to be found guilty of conspiring to commit those crimes. 

In asking that both Ligambi's and Borgesi's motions be denied, prosecutors said what the government has to prove is that both defendants played in a role in a racketeering conspiracy in which:

(1) Two or more persons agreed to conduct or participate in the conduct of the affairs of the Philadelphia (La Cosa Nostra) Family through a pattern of racketeering activity or the collection of unlawful debt.

(2) The defendants were party to the agreement.

(3) They joined the agreement knowing of its objective of conducting the affairs of the Philadelphia LCN Family through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt and with the intent of joining with one other conspirator to achieve that objective.

A court ruling in the government's favor would allow prosecutors to use basically the same evidence and the same witnesses in the retrial that the government used in a three-month trial that began last October. Those witnesses would likely include Louis "Bent Finger Lou" Monacello, 43, a key Borgesi associate who testified at length about a gambling and loansharking operation he said he ran for Borgesi after Borgesi was jailed in 2000 in an unrelated racketeering case.

Monacello also testified that Ligambi was the boss of the operation.
Bent Finger Lou (R)

In fact, Borgesi was behind bars serving a 14-year sentence during most of the period covered by the conspiracy charge. Warren had argued that the jury's not guilty verdicts on specific gambling and loansharking charges showed that the jury had rejected the prosecution argument that Borgesi had conspired with Monacello. 

Labor argued that the verdict did not necessarily support that argument. He said that Borgesi also had conspired with Ligambi and Anthony Staino, another mob leader. 

The prosecution contends that it should not be precluded "from introducing evidence relating to the offenses charged in the substantive counts as circumstantial proof of the manner and means, or overt acts, of the RICO conspiracy," even if a jury returned not guilty verdicts on those substantive counts.

It appeared the jury at the first trial wrestled with the conspiracy charge. The panel deliberated for a staggering 21 days before bringing back a mixed and confusing verdict. Only five of the 61 counts in the case resulted in guilty verdicts. Three of the seven defendants were convicted of racketeering conspiracy. (A fourth subsequently pleaded guilty). 

The jury found the defendants not guilty of 46 other counts and was undecided -- on hung -- on 11 charges. 

Two of the charges on which the jury could not decide were the racketeering conspiracy counts against Ligambi, 73, and Borgesi. In addition, Ligambi faces two gambling counts and a tampering with a witness charge on which the jury also hung. He was acquitted of five other criminal counts.  

Both Ligambi and Borgesi have been denied bail pending the retrial.

Four other defendants in the case, Staino, mob underboss Joseph "Mousie" Massimino, mob soldier Damion Canalichio and mob associate Gary Battaglini are to be sentenced in July before Robreno.

Joseph "Scoops" Licata, a North Jersey-based mob capo, was found not guilty and released after the trial. Six defendants in the case pleaded guilty prior to trial. 

George Anastasia can be reached at George@bigtrial.net. 


  1. This is crap. The feds should focus on real crime instead of harmless gambling charges. The government sponsors gambling for christs sakes.

  2. Isn't Pa second to only Nevada in the amount of casinos? What a waste of money. The Mob in Philly is all but dead except for a few thugs that don't have an employable skill.

  3. complete waste of tax payers money. They have these trials so people can wake up and go to work everyday. The judges, district attorneys, prosecutors and last but not least the feds. Give it up. Ten year investigation and the jury rejected 90 percent of their case. Let them go home. They did their time.

  4. the FBI has manufactured a case out of personal vendetta against the philly mob . after millions of tax payer money spent on a very week case to begin with. this is travesty of justice . let them go already.

  5. Why wouldn't they have a vedetta against Philly LCN? There an organized crime family. FBI and OC reports have continued to say that the Philly/SJ family is still a very viable OC group. You shouldn't be mad at them for prosecuting them, you should upset because they completely botched it...just like they did in the Merlino trial and now that scumbag and most of his inner circle out on the street or close to it.

  6. Theres also about 1 thousand drug dealers in north philly shooting, stabbing, rapting, and killing people on a daily basis. Thats pretty viable. Fact is the majority of people realize what this prosecution; a trumped up persecution.

  7. Yoo hoo? Ne1 ever here of double jeopardy? How can these fellows be tryed twice for the same crime?

  8. to respond to other comment. who are you to call joe merlino a scumbag.how do we know your not a scumbag. when I grew up as kid the Italian mob helped keep the area safe. and they never bothered anybody and so I enjoyed the safety they provided. and I agree go after northeast philly crack and heroin dealers.go after other ethnic groups.

  9. I don't understand how evidence of crimes, for which they were aquitted, can be used against them in a re-trial. It seems to defy logic to use evidence of something they DIDN'T DO as evidence that they did it. Confused? That's exactly my point. This seems like a total railroad-job; basically, if the gov't can label you as "Mafia" then they can ignore the law/Constitution in their attempt to convict you. Hmm, the gov't ignoring the law/Constitution to go after those they don't like . . . sounds like something else that just happened recently i.e. the IRS scandal.

  10. Im wondering how the crimes you were all ready tried for and found not guilty as in you didn't commit those crimes be used as evidence of a conspiracy. If you didn't do anything how can the things you didn't do be used as evidence that you conspired to do crimes as a part of a ongoing criminal conspiracy. This is more of the government you conspired to conspire about conspiring bullshit. In other words they are sore losers and if they want you to be guilty you will be no matter what. They just make the rules up as they go along. Im sure I will be a target now just for speaking my mind. Im conspiring to think.


Thoughtful commentary welcome. Trolling, harassing, and defaming not welcome. Consistent with 47 U.S.C. 230, we have the right to delete without warning any comments we believe are obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.