tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8876661997317409023.post7108385235134947797..comments2023-10-22T09:32:13.417-04:00Comments on Big Trial | Philadelphia Trial Blog: What Juror In Sandusky Case Told Louis Freeh's Investigators Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04116104602505815614noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8876661997317409023.post-41806975649121405762020-06-13T10:32:14.587-04:002020-06-13T10:32:14.587-04:00Where is the outrage and protests for the injustic...Where is the outrage and protests for the injustice and discrimination Jerry Sandusky has endured? Where are the chants of Justice for Jerry?? This travesty and miscarriage of Justice is deplorable. Why is Jerry’s life discounted! Affirms my belief that the cry should be: “ALL” Lives Matter!!! It’s time for the truth to be revealed mammabakeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12958105384427104647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8876661997317409023.post-54175789316333595752020-05-20T22:38:38.256-04:002020-05-20T22:38:38.256-04:00Pauley certainly seemed to be a disgruntled employ...Pauley certainly seemed to be a disgruntled employee so would not have made an unbiased witness. <br /><br />I think all this evidence should be enough for a new trial but I doubt Sandusky will get one. The judge will just say none of it would have affected the outcome of the trial.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8876661997317409023.post-5308816762012101162020-05-19T10:13:28.014-04:002020-05-19T10:13:28.014-04:00Where do we start with this whole pile of stinking...Where do we start with this whole pile of stinking dung, called the PA Judicial System, and Louis Freeh? First we know Louis Freeh lied on his Report, from the very beginning. He makes reference to the fact that he insures "security" of his fact gathering, by having separate a office with separate keys for only his personnel. How Computers were on separate lines and were not part of the PSU internet system. He explains how no one from the outside was allowed in this area unless accompanied by Freeh personnel. He goes on, and writes, "No Party interfered with, or attempted to influence the findings in this report." Then what was the emails (Found in the Corman v NCAA discovery phase) between Emmert, Delaney, and Louis Freeh with regards to what the NCAA needed, and Delaney needed, to impose penalties on PSU? Freeh also goes on and states, "The Special Investigative Counsel (who I have been calling Freeh in this comment) revealed this report and the findings herein to the Board of Trustees, and the general public at the same time." If that was true how did CNN on July 2 2012 report about emails that were found in the Freeh report https://www.cnn.com/2012/06/30/justice/penn-state-emails/index.html when Freeh didn't release his report to the media until July 12, 2012? catalacjackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11168377742653358187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8876661997317409023.post-44866495141970583852020-05-19T00:20:48.994-04:002020-05-19T00:20:48.994-04:00Another example of Fred's flawed, "fact f...Another example of Fred's flawed, "fact freeh" railroad job of Paterno, Spanier, Schultz and Curley. Time to subpoena the entire exec. comm. of the PSU BoT to investigate their collusion with Freeh AND the NCAA. And that scum Tom Corbett should be subpoened as well to investigate his role after "suggesting" Freeh to be investigated. Hope, Sandusky's defense team will also get Snedden to testify about his findings that the entire "scandal" was a Corbett-Freeh-PS BoT exec. comm. political hatchet job. Time to kill ALL these rats in one, fell swoop.MacDougalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17010921360016263368noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8876661997317409023.post-51799792560036044062020-05-18T17:51:12.079-04:002020-05-18T17:51:12.079-04:00"she feels that [former Penn State Athletic D..."she feels that [former Penn State Athletic Director Tim] Curley and [former Penn State vice president Gary] Schultz are responsible for the scandal." And there it is. This juror went in already convinced Sandusky was guilty; otherwise, there would be no scandal to speak of. She had a legal obligation to inform the defense team that her mind was already made up. And it's not as if one juror doesn't matter since there are eleven other jurors who would have to agree with her in order to convict. Anyone who has ever read "12 Angry Men" knows one single rogue juror can poison an entire jury.mhentzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17177731477541716848noreply@blogger.com